By Jared Alder, MS

The removal of phosphorus from wastewater can be performed using physico-chemical methods, biological treatment, and/or combinations of both. Physico-chemical processes of phosphorus removal have been widely used. Such physico-chemical processes are generally effective, reliable, and do need a lot of large capital equipment; however, they are not without limitations. For example, adding chemicals to treatment processes can impact the pH of the treatment process, thus resulting in the need for additional chemicals to adjust the pH before the treated water can be discharged. In some cases, because of the chemical usage, a chemical sludge can be created and there may need to be additional treatment steps for removing the sludge.
The most common chemical phosphorus removal options utilize dosing metal salts—such as ferric chloride as part of pre-treatment—into activated sludge reactors or as part of the secondary clarifier process. Ferric chloride (or similar metal salts) precipitates phosphorus in the wastewater and the resulting solids residuals are removed either by settling under gravity or by filtration. The subsequent precipitates may be rich in phosphorus but, since it is chemically bound, it can make recovering the phosphorus challenging—which presents a disadvantage over Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) systems because it reduces the economic benefits of the phosphorus-rich sludge.
Removal rates for phosphorus are typically proportional to the mass of the chemical added, which influences the amount of extra solids produced; therefore, a balance between the two is critical. Phosphorus effluent concentrations of 1 mg/L or greater can generally be achieved by gravity settling. Techniques including filtration and tertiary-ballasted flocculation are sometimes combined with metal-salt dosing to achieve lower phosphorus levels, even down to concentrations of < 0.50 mg/L.
Since chemical dosing is generally reliable and widely accepted, it is the most commonly used treatment option.
Related Posts
This Week in Ag #52
What are farmers doing during these cold winter days? If they farm in the Midwest, they may be laying tile. I realize this may be a foreign concept to my friends in the west, but in many areas of the Corn Belt, you must often move water out of your fields. In heavier soils, excessive rainwater can remain
This Week in Ag #49
The image below is more than just a funny meme. It depicts how generations of farmers painted the canvas of their fields. The farm I grew up on consisted of a 160-acre field, complete with waterways, hills, wet holes, varying soil types, point rows, and in spots, contest-winning yield potential. We annually split the field
Bio Huma Netics Appoints Jonathan Plehn as CFO
Bio Huma Netics, Inc. (BHN), President and CEO Lyndon Smith has announced the appointment of Jonathan Plehn to the position of Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Vice President of Finance and Accounting. BHN produces the Huma Gro®, Huma Gro® Turf, Fertilgold® Organics, Probiotic Solutions®, and Mesa Verde Humates® product lines. Mr. Plehn brings a wealth

