By Heather Jennings, PE
When I first came into the water field in the 2000s, the general rule of Chemical Oxygen Demand to Biochemical Oxygen Demand (or COD to BOD5) was 2:1. That was pretty much all you needed to know in order to understand whether something could be treated chemically, physically, or biologically. Now, the wastewater industry has moved toward COD instead of BOD5. The reason that COD is sometimes preferred is that BOD5 doesn’t take into account the organics that become biomass nor the non-biodegradable carbonaceous matter. COD can also be evaluated in the field with simple test kits, whereas most operators must send their BOD5 tests to third-party labs and wait weeks for results.
The way we talk about COD has changed over time as well. As science and operators have become more sophisticated at evaluating COD fractions, we’ve discovered root causes for issues that have plagued operators for many years. Now, when we talk about CODs it’s more about the COD fractions, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), particulate COD, and whether the COD is biodegradable when we try to model, create computer simulations, or find root causes of wastewater treatment system issues.
Total COD (TCOD) is broken down into two different COD groups: biodegradable and nonbiodegradable. Let’s cover the biodegradable first. Biodegradable can be further broken down into two fractions, readily biodegradable (soluble) COD (rbCOD) and slowly biodegradable particulated COD (sbCOD). Complexes of alcohols, amino acids, simple sugars and VFAs make up rbCOD, whereas sbCOD is made up of proteins, fats oils and grease (FOG), complex carbohydrates, etc. rbCOD has the advantage of being able to be readily absorbed through cell membranes, whereas sbCOD must be adsorbed, broken down with extracellular enzymes, or hydrolyzed and then absorbed. For this reason, rbCOD is the preferred carbon source in wastewater treatment.
rbCOD concentration can have a significant impact on phosphorus removal and the nitrification-denitrification cycle, as both processes occur at a higher rate with rbCOD. This can be advantageous, as these processes can then require smaller anoxic or anaerobic tank sizes to complete both processes. Too much rbCOD can create issues if coupled with a high food–to–mass ratio, resulting in bulking and filamentous issues. Plug flow aeration is also impacted by high rbCOD concentrations, as it requires a higher oxygen demand toward the front of the aeration basin compared with the end of the aeration basin. Another condition to discuss is when aeration is limited or “maxed out”: a high rbCOD uptake rate can cause dissolved oxygen to drop dramatically and inadvertently create anoxic zones that can lead to poor overall COD treatment.
High levels of sbCOD can also lead to operational issues, especially when there is poor COD uptake due to a slug of FOG, etc., that can lead to filamentous issues or stimulate nitrification in areas where it’s not wanted. If there is a low hydraulic retention rate with high levels of sbCOD, you could also develop poor COD treatment conditions.
Nonbiodegradable COD can be broken down into soluble (nbsCOD) and particulate (nbpCOD) fractions, and neither fraction contributes to microbial treatment of wastewater. nbsCOD leaves biological treatment in the effluent and impacts the TCOD in the effluent, on which permits are based. I have had industrial customers who have successfully reduced the TCOD in their effluent, only to struggle with the last 15% needed to meet their permit due to the high percentage of nbsCOD. The treatment struggle can be very real with nbsCOD.
nbpCOD is the portion of COD that contributes significantly to solids in primary clarification and waste activated sludge. nbpCOD can also contribute to higher TCOD when there are settling issues within the wastewater treatment system. It reduces the digestibility of the wasted sludge because it is not biodegradable.
As a wastewater industry, we’ve come a long way in evaluating and understanding the different fractions of total COD! Hopefully, understanding it will assist us in better understanding treatment issues and help the industry as a whole to find better solutions for them.
Related Posts
Mighty Micronutrients – Q&A with CMO Fred Nichols
Fred Nichols, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer at Huma®, shared his perspective in a recent article on micronutrient technology, published in CropLife. In the article, Fred discusses how advancements in micronutrient formulations are meeting increased demand, improving nutrient availability, and enhancing crop performance. Below are the key topics along with Fred’s insights.
This Week In Ag #103: Short-Term Pain, Long-Term Gain?
“There’s got to be a better way.” Those words were expressed to me last week at the World Ag Expo. I had just completed my presentation, “Breathe New Life into Your Soil”, when a nice lady and her husband approached me. She introduced herself as a multi-generational rancher who grows alfalfa and orchard grass for their
Microplex® JS Jump Starts Utah Summer Camp WWTF
by Heather Jennings, PE If I had to choose a favorite of our microbial products it would have to be our Microplex® JS product. It is a two-part formulation of a live synergistic blend of natural, Class I bacteria, specifically chosen for their ability to rapidly degrade solids, fats, lipids, proteins, detergents, hydrocarbons, and other
