By Heather Jennings, PE
When I first came into the water field in the 2000s, the general rule of Chemical Oxygen Demand to Biochemical Oxygen Demand (or COD to BOD5) was 2:1. That was pretty much all you needed to know in order to understand whether something could be treated chemically, physically, or biologically. Now, the wastewater industry has moved toward COD instead of BOD5. The reason that COD is sometimes preferred is that BOD5 doesn’t take into account the organics that become biomass nor the non-biodegradable carbonaceous matter. COD can also be evaluated in the field with simple test kits, whereas most operators must send their BOD5 tests to third-party labs and wait weeks for results.
The way we talk about COD has changed over time as well. As science and operators have become more sophisticated at evaluating COD fractions, we’ve discovered root causes for issues that have plagued operators for many years. Now, when we talk about CODs it’s more about the COD fractions, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), particulate COD, and whether the COD is biodegradable when we try to model, create computer simulations, or find root causes of wastewater treatment system issues.
Total COD (TCOD) is broken down into two different COD groups: biodegradable and nonbiodegradable. Let’s cover the biodegradable first. Biodegradable can be further broken down into two fractions, readily biodegradable (soluble) COD (rbCOD) and slowly biodegradable particulated COD (sbCOD). Complexes of alcohols, amino acids, simple sugars and VFAs make up rbCOD, whereas sbCOD is made up of proteins, fats oils and grease (FOG), complex carbohydrates, etc. rbCOD has the advantage of being able to be readily absorbed through cell membranes, whereas sbCOD must be adsorbed, broken down with extracellular enzymes, or hydrolyzed and then absorbed. For this reason, rbCOD is the preferred carbon source in wastewater treatment.
rbCOD concentration can have a significant impact on phosphorus removal and the nitrification-denitrification cycle, as both processes occur at a higher rate with rbCOD. This can be advantageous, as these processes can then require smaller anoxic or anaerobic tank sizes to complete both processes. Too much rbCOD can create issues if coupled with a high food–to–mass ratio, resulting in bulking and filamentous issues. Plug flow aeration is also impacted by high rbCOD concentrations, as it requires a higher oxygen demand toward the front of the aeration basin compared with the end of the aeration basin. Another condition to discuss is when aeration is limited or “maxed out”: a high rbCOD uptake rate can cause dissolved oxygen to drop dramatically and inadvertently create anoxic zones that can lead to poor overall COD treatment.
High levels of sbCOD can also lead to operational issues, especially when there is poor COD uptake due to a slug of FOG, etc., that can lead to filamentous issues or stimulate nitrification in areas where it’s not wanted. If there is a low hydraulic retention rate with high levels of sbCOD, you could also develop poor COD treatment conditions.
Nonbiodegradable COD can be broken down into soluble (nbsCOD) and particulate (nbpCOD) fractions, and neither fraction contributes to microbial treatment of wastewater. nbsCOD leaves biological treatment in the effluent and impacts the TCOD in the effluent, on which permits are based. I have had industrial customers who have successfully reduced the TCOD in their effluent, only to struggle with the last 15% needed to meet their permit due to the high percentage of nbsCOD. The treatment struggle can be very real with nbsCOD.
nbpCOD is the portion of COD that contributes significantly to solids in primary clarification and waste activated sludge. nbpCOD can also contribute to higher TCOD when there are settling issues within the wastewater treatment system. It reduces the digestibility of the wasted sludge because it is not biodegradable.
As a wastewater industry, we’ve come a long way in evaluating and understanding the different fractions of total COD! Hopefully, understanding it will assist us in better understanding treatment issues and help the industry as a whole to find better solutions for them.
Related Posts
Proof of His Vision: The 1984 Humic Acid Study
Decades before humic acids became more understood in agriculture, Dr. Jordan G. Smith was already testing their impact on plant growth. This newly uncovered 1984 study, co-authored by Huma’s founder, validates a vision that still drives our mission today.
Fred Nichols’ Insights on Microbiome and the Biologicals Boom
Recently, CropLife interviewed several industry experts, including Huma’s Chief Marketing and Chief Sales Officer, Fred Nichols, to discuss the rapid growth of biological products in agriculture, including biostimulants, biopesticides, and biofertilizers. Fred answered important questions about the microbiome’s role in soil health, industry’s understanding of it, and the new innovations being developed for sustainable farming.
The Spring Rush: What Farmers Are Up Against
The Spring Rush: What Farmers Are Up Against “Farmers are always thinking about our products.” I’ll never forget those words, uttered by an old client of mine. She worked for a large life sciences company. We were launching a pre-emergence corn herbicide, to a market saturated with them. I thought she was joking. She wasn’t. I told her that in the hierarchy of thoughts occupying a farmer’s mind, pre-emergent herbicides barely registered. Adding that we had already spent more time thinking about them during our meeting than most farmers do all year. To be fair, she isn’t the only one to share this flawed view. Few occupations require more versatility, or have more irons in the fire, than farming. That’s why I’ve long advocated that anyone marketing to farmers considers not just the product they are selling, and what challenge or opportunity it may address, but what impact it will have on their entire operation – from soil to software, labor to logistics. Because that’s how farmers think. As the calendar turns to April, we’re entering the busiest – and most critical time – of the year.
