By Heather Jennings, PE
Phosphorus is one of the most abundant elements on earth. It’s essential for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the energy carrier life is built on. But in excess in our lakes and ponds, we see large algal growths occurring. Many times, these algal blooms suffocate the surrounding aquatic life and or produce toxins that can kill both aquatic life and humans.
How does phosphorus get into our rivers and lakes? I’m glad you asked! Some of the sources are runoff from farm and lawn fertilizers or partial wastewater treatment of raw influent. With the exception of periodic excursion, wastewater treatment plants are typically operating under tight water quality permits with less than 1 mg/L of Total Phosphorus in their discharge permits. This limit is often less than the background phosphorus existing in receiving waters. The permits can be even tighter if the treatment plant discharges to sensitive waters of the U.S. (as defined for the Clean Water Act).
Wastewater treatment plants receive varying sources of wastewater. They are really at the mercy of the community and sometimes the industrial or commercial customers in terms of how much phosphorus they receive daily.
Many operators are looking toward biological and/or chemical and physical solutions to remove phosphorus from effluent. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is based on developing bacterial populations that have the ability to store 5 to 30 percent of their dry weight in phosphorus. A well-running EBPR system followed by clarification can achieve 0.7 mg/L of effluent phosphorus.
These types of phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAOs) are unique because although they are aerobic bacteria, they can still consume volatile fatty acids (VFAs) or simple carbons under anaerobic conditions and, when returned to aerobic conditions, take up additional phosphorus in the form of polyphosphate.
Another way of thinking of the process is that it is conditioning bacteria through the anaerobic stage to be prepared to consume additional phosphorus—just like professional eating competitors prepping for the big event day. These bacteria can then be removed from the treatment system in the waste-activated sludge (WAS) or recirculated in the returned-activated sludge (RAS).
As a rule of thumb, the minimum influent BOD:P ratio needs to be 25:1 to be successful, but many systems augment the anaerobic process with VFAs either by side stream fermentation or chemical addition to provide the necessary BOD. If there is not a sufficient carbon source like VFAs during the anaerobic process, the PAOs will not be able to take up additional phosphorus in aerobic conditions.
As with everything else in the universe, PAOs have competitors—especially for VFAs during the anaerobic stage. These bacteria are called glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAOs). GAOs do not contribute to phosphorus removal, and their increase can indicate problems within the EBPR system. Think of GAOs as that one cousin that comes to the family party, eats everything, and leaves before it’s time to clean up. Not a lot of help in general with phosphorus.
There are several process controls that can help PAOs dominate. PAOs prefer higher temperatures than GAOs. PAOs also prefer a pH between 7.25 and 8.0 in the anaerobic process that naturally pre-select against GAOs. There is also a preference for specific VFAs, such as propionic acid over acetic acid, in the anaerobic process that can be used to push the microbial population toward PAOs.
Although there are a lot of conditions to meet EBPR needs, to be successful it is possible to retrofit systems to meet their needs while providing a biological treatment option for phosphorus. It certainly warrants looking into when dealing with phosphorus removal!
Related Posts
The Immortal Words of a Corn Legend
"Any corn plant that doesn’t emerge within 12 hours of others is a weed.” Immortal words from an immortal farmer. My friend Steve Albracht. The brash Texan certainly had a way with words. And with corn. I called him the Ric Flair of corn growers – he held as many National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) yield contest titles as Flair has wrestling championships. And he was just as bold. Visiting his Hart, Texas, farm was akin to visiting that of Francis Childs or Roswell Garst. Fast, uniform crop emergence and singulation weren’t just a goal; it was his obsession. He wanted every plant in the entire field to emerge within eight hours. Studies show that plants emerging 24 hours later can lose up to 25% of their yield. While some corn hybrids may be called racehorses, they don’t close on each other like racehorses do. Slow emergers and runt plants will never catch up to early risers.
Paving the Way with Effective Environmental Products
Bio Huma Netics Inc. (BHN) provides ecologically sustainable products and services that replenish the earth by restoring water quality, reviving soil fertility, and renewing food value, thus enhancing the quality of life for all living beings. Using its proprietary Micro Carbon Technology®, BHN manufactures its HUMA GRO® and HUMA GRO® TURF lines of liquid nutrient
This Week in Ag #45
“Life.” That was my response when asked “What does soil health mean?” during an interview on The Big Show with WHO Radio last week. Whether it’s accelerating populations of soil microbes and worms, creating diverse biological communities or building biomass and aggregates, healthy soils are full of life. The trick is to stimulate and maintain biology in
