A small municipality in Utah (pop. 1,800) had a wastewater system with a flow rate of 192,000 gallons per day. The system included a series of four lagoons, although at this time only Ponds 1 and 2 were being evaluated for treatment.
The influent consisted of domestic waste as well as septic. Pond 1 was specifically being addressed due to a State mandate. A sludge judge was performed which showed Pond 1 had an average sludge depth of 2.7 feet and Pond 2 averaged 1.9 feet. Two years later surfacing sludge prevented a sludge judge from being performed. The system was in need of reducing the sludge in its lagoon wastewater system to meet state requirements quickly in preparation for additional capital changes to the system.
Dredging costs were more than the town could afford, so an alternative method was sought to biologically break down the accumulated solids. To continue reading . . . Download PDF Read Online
Related Posts
Use of Biostimulants for Upset Recovery in Paper Mill Wastewater Systems
By Heather Jennings, PE Two specific Probiotic Solutions® liquid bioremediation products were used at a large-scale paper mill in China to address system upsets caused by hydraulic loading from new upstream processes. The products involved are Bio Energizer® (BE)—a scientific formulation of organic acids, buffers, natural biological stimulants, micronutrients, and energy systems—and Micatrol® (MT), a
Natural, Efficient Sludge Reduction
Let us help you reduce Sludge, Odor, BOD/COD, and FOG’s the easy and affordable way- with our Probiotic Solutions® products. They are used successfully in wastewater treatment systems to improve water quality and reduce operating costs. Our ultra-efficient products are liquid biostimulants that accelerate the degradation of organic waste by increasing microbial activity and balancing nutrients in the growth environment. Probiotic Solutions®
Bio Energizer® Improves SVI by 50% at Citrus Plant Wastewater Treatment
A citrus plant struggled with poor settling in the clarifier of its wastewater treatment, which caused the sludge blanket to remain high. Even at a low flow rate of 1.2 million gallons per day (MGD), the high sludge blanked allowed less than 18” of free board. The slightest flow increase caused solids to carry over
