Farmers grow food. That’s a simple and straight-forward premise. Or is it? We continue to shake our heads at survey results that reveal many consumers think their food comes from the grocery store. But what about the industry itself? If we’re being totally honest, we should ask: are we largely focused on growing food, or producing commodities?
Much of our modern ag system has been about generating the most grain for the least amount of money. Efficiency over nurture. That’s not necessarily a reflection of the will of the farmer, but current economic realities. Much of our commodity-based infrastructure – 315 million acres worth – is set up to grow, insure, process, store, ship and trade grain. Growing up on our Illinois family farm, this was not always the case. That’s because along with a variety of crops, we raised beef and pork. Some of it would find its way in our deep freezer. So, a portion of the crops we grew fed and bed our livestock, and our livestock fed us. We also grew sweet corn and sold it directly to consumers and local grocers. Over time, specialized monocropping systems, absent of livestock and direct-to-the-plate food crops, changed things. This is further extenuated by the fact that 40% of US corn goes to ethanol plants. From a farmer perspective (or for any producer in any industry, for that manner), the further removed you are from the final product, the easier it is to lose sight of the end product. And when efficiency is the driver, and short-term profits are the goal, it’s easy to overlook the potential adverse effects of biotech, synthetic salt-based products, monocropping and tillage. Not to mention the downstream impact on crop quality, soil health and human nutrition. Fortunately, the regen ag movement is helping shift the mindset back to where it was a couple of generations ago. Sure, potential new revenue streams for sustainably grown crops – emanating from both the private (food and fiber brands and retailers) and public (via government-imposed tax incentives for biofuels) sectors – are riveting. But it’s high input costs and a frustration with the current system that’s leading many farmers to explore and employ regenerative agriculture. And a renewed focus on food, via better stewardship, is indeed a well-intended consequence.
This marks the 100th entry of This Week in Ag. My sincere thanks to all of you who read, comment on and support this blog, and most importantly, share my passion for the world’s greatest profession.
Related Posts
This Week in Ag #31
#Harvest23 is here! If all goes well, I should be harvesting my corn plot this week. The beginning of fall brings excitement and optimism to the farm. But this year, those feelings appear tempered. Farmer sentiment dropped 8 points last month (according to the Purdue Ag Economy Barometer) as producers shared a dimming view of...
This Week in Ag #5
It’s Commodity Classic week. This is one of the ag industry’s most important shows, and among my favorite times of the year. I’ll be in Orlando for the show, as will Lyndon Smith, Barrett Smith and Michael Gardner. #Classic23 is expected to draw around 5,000 farmers. But what makes this show exceptional is not the number...
This Week in Ag #88
No month is more associated with a crop than October is with a certain orange orb. That’s why it’s #NationalPumpkinMonth. Pumpkins are the centerpiece of the booming $1.25 billion US agritourism industry. You-pick pumpkin patches are a main attraction, providing family photo opportunities young mothers love even more than their pumpkin spice lattes. Corn mazes, apple...