A small municipality in Utah (pop. 1,800) had a wastewater system with a flow rate of 192,000 gallons per day. The system included a series of four lagoons, although at this time only Ponds 1 and 2 were being evaluated for treatment.
The influent consisted of domestic waste as well as septic. Pond 1 was specifically being addressed due to a State mandate. A sludge judge was performed which showed Pond 1 had an average sludge depth of 2.7 feet and Pond 2 averaged 1.9 feet. Two years later surfacing sludge prevented a sludge judge from being performed. The system was in need of reducing the sludge in its lagoon wastewater system to meet state requirements quickly in preparation for additional capital changes to the system.
Dredging costs were more than the town could afford, so an alternative method was sought to biologically break down the accumulated solids. To continue reading . . . Download PDF Read Online
Related Posts
BIO ENERGIZER® Reduces Sludge, BOD, and Odor—City in Illinois
A small town in Illinois (pop. 3,500) had a municipal wastewater system that was in need of sludge removal. The sludge accumulation problem had become so problematic that the sludge was visible at the surface. The exposed sludge was causing an odor problem for the nearby residents. In addition, due to the high solids accumulation,
White Paper: Lagoons—Under the Surface
An In-Depth Investigation of Bioremediation and Biological Factors Involved in Reducing Sludge at a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facility Lagoon System Heather Jennings, PE, Sr. Project Engineer, Probiotic Solutions® Abstract In this study, the operators of a municipal wastewater treatment facility with 4 lagoons had determined that their 2 primary lagoons—10-foot-deep, with 25-million-gallon holding capacity each—had
Case Study: Biological Remediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil
Full Case Study Introduction: A remediation company in Arizona was selected to complete a Remedial Action Plan for soils contaminated with crude oil located in an oil production field in Texas. The crude oil contaminated soil was generated from storage tank bottom materials which had been removed from several oil recovery storage tank batteries located
